2012 Era Noastra

Mistere.Enigme. Civilizatii disparute.Organizatii secrete.Enigme romanesti.Piramidele.Misterele istoriei.Fenomene inexplicabile.Paranormal.Disparitii.Ipoteze.2012.Apocalipsa.

Explozii atomice in trecut !


Literatura antica este plina de referiri la arme de distrugere in masa, folosite de zeii primordiali. Multi istorici le considera mitologie, fara nici o legatura cu tehnologia moderna. Dar, la o analiza mai atenta, corelata cu descoperirile arheologice, aceste referiri pot intra in categoria „istorie”, cu tot ce implica domeniul. Chiar daca uimesc, chiar daca par incredibile, in timpuri greu de datat au existat razboaie in care s-au folosit bombe atomice si cu neutroni, dar si tehnologie militara inca necunoscuta

Mania zeilor sumerieni

Sumerul, una din primele mari civilizatii ale lumii, cu orasele sale prospere, patronate de puternici zei inruditi intre ei, a disparut dintr-o data. Oamenii au murit de o moarte cumplita, animalele au pierit, apa a fost otravita, solul a devenit neroditor. Ce anume a provocat un asemenea sfarsit brusc? Raspunsul se afla in legendele sumeriene, cele mai vechi documente scrise din lume: mania zeilor si armele lor de distrugere in masa.

Ne-am mutat ! Citeste articolul pe www.2012en.ro
Poate e mai simplu sa va abonati la Newsletter . Primiti zilnic un rezumat al ultimelor articole .CLICK AICI
Sponzorizat de
CRAMA NOBLESS


Anunțuri

Noiembrie 15, 2010 - Posted by | Civilizatii Enigma, Misterele Istoriei | , , , , , , ,

3 comentarii »

  1. Uite,ca de data aceasta,d-ul Gheorghe,cu care am avut si noi niste schimburi de replici,ridica niste probleme serioase.Adica nu mai este vorba nici de „adnotari”,si nici de „sex prin porumb”,ci de niste lucruri serioase,care dau de gandit celor care mai au si obiceiul sa gandeasca in mod liber,adica fara dogme,si fara ideologisme de pe timpul lui Pazvante.Bravo,Gheorghe,aici mi-a placut de tine,dincolo,nu!…

    Comentariu de Dublu E. | Noiembrie 23, 2010 | Răspunde

  2. hehe..mi-am adus aminte de ceva…cine credeti ca traia in ur in sec 21…conform bibliei??? avraam….si sic…traia in urul caldeii!!!!
    i-auziti…. Facerea 11, 28: „Şi a murit Haran înainte de Terah, tatăl său, în pământul de naştere, în Urul Caldeii.“

    pai mai…cum sa fie in secolul 21 ih urul caldeii???????el era urul sumerului!!! dar evreii…care n-au nicio legatura cu acele timpuri…au rescris istoria dupa bunul plac…fara sa tina cont de „copyright” si asa ajunse MOISE(care a trait in secolul 13ih!! sic!)sa scrie FACEREA….in care scrie de URUL CALDEII….

    acum.,….puneti mana pe istorie si aflati ca asa numitii caldei sunt neo babilonienii….care apar undeva in secolul 10 in istorie…iar al lor rege NABUCODONOSOR….in anul 586 distruge un oras, stiti voi care…si tot el…sic! reconstruieste si URUL ….pe vechiul amplasament, dar acum in CHALDEEA sa.

    Asadar marele UR sumerian a stat distrus din secolul 21 ih pana in secolul 6 ih…poate sa-mi explice si mie cineva cum moise…in sec 13 ih ne-a spus ca tatal lui avraam traia in URUL CHALDEII SI NU IN URUL SUMERULUI?????

    ps…cat despre sticla verde…mergeti in tunisia si o sa vedeti ca e plin desertul cu asa ceva…turistii o cumpara ca suvenir!

    ia luati si traduceti si despre sticla din desertul egiptului

    Mysterious Glass in the Egyptian Sahara
    Alternative HistoryArticle SourceDesert Glass
    The following segment is One of the strangest mysteries of ancient Egypt is that of the great glass sheets that were only discovered in 1932.

    In December of that year, Patrick Clayton, a surveyor for the Egyptian Geological Survey, was driving among the dunes of the Great Sand Sea near the Saad Plateau in the virtually uninhabited area just north of the southwestern corner of Egypt, when he heard his tyres crunch on something that wasn´t sand. It turned out to be large pieces of marvelously clear, yellow-green glass.

    In fact, this wasn´t just any ordinary glass, but ultra-pure glass that was an astonishing 98 per cent silica. Clayton wasn´t the first person to come across this field of glass, as various ´prehistoric´ hunters and nomads had obviously also found the now-famous Libyan Desert Glass (LDG).

    The glass had been used in the past to make knives and sharp-edged tools as well as other objects. A carved scarab of LDG was even found in Tutankhamen´s tomb, indicating that the glass was sometimes used for jewellery. An article by Giles Wright in the British science magazine New Scientist (July 10, 1999), entitled „The Riddle of the Sands”, says that LDG is the purest natural silica glass ever found.

    Over a thousand tonnes of it are strewn across hundreds of kilometres of bleak desert. Some of the chunks weigh 26 kilograms, but most LDG exists in smaller, angular pieces–looking like shards left when a giant green bottle was smashed by colossal forces.

    According to the article, LDG, pure as it is, does contain tiny bubbles, white wisps and inky black swirls. The whitish inclusions consist of refractory minerals such as cristobalite. The ink-like swirls, though, are rich in iridium, which is diagnostic of an extraterrestrial impact such as a meteorite or comet, according to conventional wisdom. The general theory is that the glass was created by the searing, sand-melting impact of a cosmic projectile.

    However, there are serious problems with this theory, says Wright, and many mysteries concerning this stretch of desert containing the pure glass. The main problem: Where did this immense amount of widely dispersed glass shards come from? There is no evidence of an impact crater of any kind; the surface of the Great Sand Sea shows no sign of a giant crater, and neither do microwave probes made deep into the sand by satellite radar.

    Furthermore, LDG seems to be too pure to be derived from a messy cosmic collision. Wright mentions that known impact craters, such as the one at Wabar in Saudi Arabia, are littered with bits of iron and other meteorite debris. This is not the case with the Libyan Desert Glass site. What is more, LDG is concentrated in two areas, rather than one. One area is oval-shaped; the other is a circular ring, six kilometres wide and 21 kilometres in diameter. The ring´s wide centre is devoid of the glass.

    One theory is that there was a soft projectile impact: a meteorite, perhaps 30 metres in diameter, may have detonated about 10 kilometres or so above the Great Sand Sea, the searing blast of hot air melting the sand beneath. Such a craterless impact is thought to have occurred in the 1908 Tunguska event in Siberia–at least as far as mainstream science is concerned. That event, like the pure desert glass, remains a mystery.

    Another theory has a meteorite glancing off the desert surface, leaving a glassy crust and a shallow crater that was soon filled in. But there are two known areas of LDG. Were there two cosmic projectiles in tandem?

    Alternatively, is it possible that the vitrified desert is the result of atomic war in the ancient past? Could a Tesla-type beam weapon have melted the desert, perhaps in a test?

    An article entitled „Dating the Libyan Desert Silica-Glass” appeared in the British journal Nature (no. 170) in 1952. Said the author, Kenneth Oakley:3

    Pieces of natural silica-glass up to 16 lb in weight occur scattered sparsely in an oval area, measuring 130 km north to south and 53 km from east to west, in the Sand Sea of the Libyan Desert. This remarkable material, which is almost pure (97 per cent silica), relatively light (sp. gin. 2.21), clear and yellowish-green in colour, has the qualities of a gemstone. It was discovered by the Egyptian Survey Expedition under Mr P.A. Clayton in 1932, and was thoroughly investigated by Dr L.J. Spencer, who joined a special expedition of the Survey for this purpose in 1934.

    The pieces are found in sand-free corridors between north-south dune ridges, about 100 m high and 2&endash;5 km apart. These corridors or „streets” have a rubbly surface, rather like that of a „speedway” track, formed by angular gravel and red loamy weathering debris overlying Nubian sandstone. The pieces of glass lie on this surface or partly embedded in it. Only a few small fragments were found below the surface, and none deeper than about one metre. All the pieces on the surface have been pitted or smoothed by sand-blast. The distribution of the glass is patchyÉ

    While undoubtedly natural, the origin of the Libyan silica-glass is uncertain. In its constitution it resembles the tektites of supposed cosmic origin, but these are much smaller. Tektites are usually black, although one variety found in Bohemia and Moravia and known as moldavite is clear deep-green. The Libyan silica-glass has also been compared with the glass formed by the fusion of sand in the heat generated by the fall of a great meteorite; for example, at Wabar in Arabia and at Henbury in central Australia.

    Reporting the findings of his expedition, Dr Spencer said that he had not been able to trace the Libyan glass to any source; no fragments of meteorites or indications of meteorite craters could be found in the area of its distribution. He said: „It seemed easier to assume that it had simply fallen from the sky.”

    It would be of considerable interest if the time of origin or arrival of the silica-glass in the Sand Sea could be determined geologically or archaeologically. Its restriction to the surface or top layer of a superficial deposit suggests that it is not of great antiquity from the geological point of view. On the other hand, it has clearly been there since prehistoric times. Some of the flakes were submitted to Egyptologists in Cairo, who regarded them as „late Neolithic or pre-dynastic”. In spite of a careful search by Dr Spencer and the late Mr A. Lucas, no objects of silica-glass could be found in the collections from Tut-Ankh-Amen´s tomb or from any of the other dynastic tombs. No potsherds were encountered in the silica-glass area, but in the neighbourhood of the flakings some „crude spear-points of glass” were found; also some quartzite implements, „quernstones” and ostrich-shell fragments.

    Oakley is apparently incorrect when he says that LDG was not found in Tutankhamen´s tomb, as according to Wright a piece was found.

    At any rate, the vitrified areas of the Libyan Desert are yet to be explained. Are they evidence of an ancient war–a war that may have turned North Africa and Arabia into the desert that it is today?

    Consider these verses from the ancient Mahabharata*:

    …(it was) a single projectile
    Charged with all the power of the Universe.
    An incandescent column of smoke and flame
    As bright as the thousand suns
    Rose in all its splendour…

    …it was an unknown weapon,
    An iron thunderbolt,
    A gigantic messenger of death,
    Which reduced to ashes
    The entire race of the Vrishnis and the Andhakas.

    …The corpses were so burned
    As to be unrecognisable.
    The hair and nails fell out;
    Pottery broke without apparent cause,
    And the birds turned white.

    After a few hours
    All foodstuffs were infected…
    ….to escape from this fire
    The soldiers threw themselves in streams
    To wash themselves and their equipment.24

    Comentariu de GHEORGHE | Noiembrie 16, 2010 | Răspunde

  3. Informatii de necrezut.Daca si traducerile sunt corecte istoria omenirii ar trebui rescrisa.Este greu de crezut ca oameni din epoca pietrei traiau in conditiile in care multe din satele noastre nici nu viseaza (canalizare,bai publice,case canalizate,etc).Toate constructiile au fost realizate din caramida.Cum au reusit sa fabrice milioane de caramizi intr-un timp relativ scurt?Pentru mai multe informatii si poze accesati http://www.mohenjodaro.net/index.html

    Comentariu de Aurel | Noiembrie 16, 2010 | Răspunde


Lasă un răspuns

Te rog autentifică-te folosind una dintre aceste metode pentru a publica un comentariu:

Gravatar
Logo WordPress.com

Comentezi folosind contul tău WordPress.com. ( Dezautentificare / Schimbă )

Poză Twitter

Comentezi folosind contul tău Twitter. ( Dezautentificare / Schimbă )

Fotografie Facebook

Comentezi folosind contul tău Facebook. ( Dezautentificare / Schimbă )

Fotografie Google+

Comentezi folosind contul tău Google+. ( Dezautentificare / Schimbă )

Anulează

Conectare la %s

« Anterioară | Următoare »

%d blogeri au apreciat asta: